Common questions

I'm Right is Britain's Court of Pointless Arguments. Two sides state their case, the Tribunal weighs both arguments, and a single verdict comes back with a confidence rating.

Yes. I'm Right is currently 100% free to use. There is no payment required to receive the standard Tribunal verdict, no card details are ever requested, and there is no payment screen after you type your argument. We won't promise every future feature will be free, but nothing on the site today costs anything.

No. There is no sign-up, no login and no profile. You type the argument and the verdict appears on the same page, with a private link you can keep or share.

It reads both arguments as written, separates matters of fact from matters of taste, and reaches a reasoned view. It does not browse the web, contact anyone or check external sources, so it judges the case in front of it rather than gathering new evidence.

Yes. Every verdict is produced by an AI model acting as the Tribunal, in the Court's voice. They are written for entertainment, not as expert findings.

No. Nothing here is legal, medical, financial or professional advice, and the Court has no actual authority. It is a game about being right.

Yes. Each verdict gets its own private link with share buttons for WhatsApp, X, Facebook or a plain copied link. The link is unguessable, so only people you send it to can see it.

No, not unless you choose to feature your case. The full argument text you type is never published, and a case only appears in Recent Cases if you submit it for publication and it passes moderation. See the privacy notice for the detail.

The famous recurring disagreements — Die Hard at Christmas, pineapple on pizza, jam or cream first — heard once by the Court and kept permanently on file, with both sides set out in full. Browse them on the Landmark Arguments page.

Real verdicts whose owners chose to make them publicly discoverable, newest first. You can browse them all.

That is the whole point. Enter both sides yourself, or issue a private summons so your opponent files their own defence before the Tribunal rules.

Usually a few seconds. The Court occasionally deliberates for a little longer when it is busy.

Frequently, and it admits it. Subjective disputes get a lower confidence rating precisely because there is no correct answer. You are entitled to disagree loudly, which is traditionally how these arguments continue anyway.