Verdict
Matt is right
A Savoury Continental Success for The Hangover Court
The dispute
Is cold pizza an acceptable breakfast?
Hannah v Matt
While Hannah correctly identifies the questionable aesthetics of congealed fats, Matt successfully argues that the constituent components differ little from a toasted sandwich or a cold platter. The dispute is one of convention rather than safety, and Matt's argument for efficiency and flavour profiles holds more internal consistency than Hannah's appeal to mere 'respectability'.
The Tribunal suggests Hannah might feel more dignified if she simply placed the box on a plate before weeping over her life choices.
Share your victory
Send the judgment to the person who was wrong.
Published in Recent Cases
This case has been approved and is listed publicly. To have it removed, use “Report this case” below.